Peruvian law requires the government to recognise indigenous peoples's ownership of their lands. Yet 594 communities with claims to 20 million hectares of land remain with no secure title -...
Rising land, food prices cause recognition of indigenous peoples' rights to stagnate
Rising food, energy, and mineral prices, coupled with new interest in forests for their carbon-storing capacity, are driving a global land grab that threatens the rights of hundreds of millions of people living in and around tropical forests, argues a new report published by the Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI).
The report, "Pushback: Local Power, Global Realignment", says that after 25 years of progress on governments recognizing forest peoples' land and resource rights (recognition of indigenous and community ownership and management tripled between 1985 and 2009), gains stagnated in 2010.
"The lack of progress at the global level in 2010 was doubly disappointing,” said Andy White, RRI Coordinator, in a statement. “On one hand the necessity of secure rights is now widely promoted by climate change negotiators and development specialists, yet on the other, the rate of recognition is not at all keeping up with the rate of large commercial land acquisitions—so called 'land grabbing.'"
The report highlights several cases of land-grabbing and violent social conflict. It says governments in some countries have conspired with development interests to undermine rights of communities, and in some cases—including instances in Nepal and Peru—clamp down on forest rights advocates.
Pushback takes an extended look at the Reducing Emissions for Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) mechanism, and sees both threats and opportunities. It notes that after years of demonstrations, forest people are finally getting a seat at the table when it comes to REDD discussions—more than 500 attended last December's climate talks in Cancún, Mexico. The report finds that groups which have the most optimistic outlook on REDD tend to be the ones that have secure rights to their land.
"At the local level, support or distrust of REDD is directly tied to how much control you have over your lands," said White. "Community groups in Mexico are very interested in REDD because they don't think it will prompt the government to come after their lands. But elsewhere, there is concern that REDD will become just another reason for government taking back land and resource rights."
Pushback says it is too early to tell whether 2011 will see progress in land tenure reform and recognition of traditional land and resource rights. It cautions that gains could erode as markets that tend to be sensitive to rights issues (Europe and the United States) shrink relative to less discerning markets.
"2011 could see a decline in the effectiveness of consumer pressure as a way to encourage land tenure reform. While consumers have been successful in pushing major western investors to act more responsibly, the West's share of the global market is declining," says RRI in a press statement. "Western interests are being replaced by investors from developing and middle income countries, who are less susceptible to consumer campaigns."
Assessing illegal logging
Chatham House is assessing the scale and effectiveness of the response to illegal logging and the related trade around the world. Full details of this work, including analysis and data, will be available online soon.